• Throwaway
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 months ago

    Thats because the added weight and power tears up trails, and the stewards hate that shit.

    • @Varyk
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      But that’s not actually enforceable?

      According to federal law, I mean?

      I’m guessing each state and county can make their own laws

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        The federal law applies to the public roads. Trails are NOT public roads. They can have any restrictions their management wants. Just like private roads at supermarkets - they’re not public roads and supermarket can say no Ford cars here and you have no recourse there.

        • @Varyk
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          By not public, trails are private because they belong to the state, you mean?

          • Throwaway
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49 months ago

            They aren’t private usually, they’re public, but maintained by volunteers.

            I helped maintain a trail for a couple years back when ebikes were just starting to be a thing, and they absolutely tore up trails. We had to put up additional signs (from the very limited budget) just for ebikes.

            • @Varyk
              link
              English
              29 months ago

              Ah, got it. I don’t go on tiny trails or dirtbiking trails.

              Pretty much all hardpack or paved.

            • @Varyk
              link
              English
              19 months ago

              What aren’t, specifically, and what is the difference of what?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        A “no motor vehicles” sign would not prohibit e-bikes. However, I see no reason why a trail couldn’t enforce prohibition of a list of categories that includes both motor vehicles and e-bikes as separate items.