• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -48 months ago
    1. “Team” isn’t a term used exclusively in the domain of sporting contests. In fact, it is a military term, as well (although not as ubiquitous in that space).

    2. Analytic and technical terms are sterile and effect a dehumanization of not only the actors involved, but also the outcomes of events.

    • krellor
      link
      fedilink
      138 months ago

      I was going to say, I hear it plenty in informal settings in politics, business, and military. Probably not a great phrase to let the press get a hold of though.

      • The Snark Urge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        98 months ago

        I would contend in turn that politics, business, and military matters are necessarily either formal or farcical.

        • krellor
          link
          fedilink
          68 months ago

          That’s about the gist of it. Either you are taking it seriously, or using humor to cope. The line between the two isn’t always clear.

    • livus
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      @Telodzrum

      1. “team” by itself just means a group of people working together to achieve a common goal, BUT when used in the context of "the other team" (with the definite article) it implies there are two teams working in opposition to one another specifically.

      @Gradually_Adjusting’s idea that this is most likely intended as a sports metaphor for Biden’s audience seems reasonable.

      1. I can’t decide whether you’re saying “team” is analytical and sterile/dehumanizing, or whether you’re suggesting that actually calling Hamas “Hamas” would have been dehumanizing.