Governor Newsom has signed several bills into law, including a sweeping mandate requiring large businesses to disclose a wide range of planet-warming emissions. Newsom has until Oct. 14 to act on legislation that lawmakers sent to his desk.


California on Saturday became the first state to ban four chemicals used in well-known candies and other foods and drinks because of their link to certain health problems.

Newsom signed a law banning the red dye No. 3 chemical used as food coloring for products like Peeps, the marshmallow treat most associated with Easter. The chemical has been linked to cancer and has been banned from makeup for more than 30 years.

The law also bans brominated vegetable oil, which is used in some store brand sodas, and potassium bromate and propylparaben, two chemicals used in baked goods.

Newsom said in a signing statement that the additives addressed in the bill are already banned in various other countries. All four chemicals are already banned in foods in the European Union.

“Signing this into law is a positive step forward on these four food additives until the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews and establishes national updated safety levels for these additives,” Newsom’s statement said.

Just Born Inc., the company that makes Peeps, has said it has been looking for other dye options for its products.

The bill was authored by Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel, a Democrat from Los Angeles.

“The Governor’s signature today represents a huge step forward in our effort to protect children and families in California from dangerous and toxic chemicals in our food supply,” Gabriel said in a statement Saturday.

The law doesn’t take effect until 2027, which Newsom said should give companies plenty of time to adapt to the new rules.

read more: https://portside.org/2023-10-23/california-bans-toxic-chemicals-our-food-supply-including-ingredient-marshmallow-peeps

    • Tb0n3
      link
      English
      09 months ago

      My point is a lot of the cancer causing ingredients do not cause cancer. And there are so many that California would not have a whole lot of things left.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        So your argument is both that many substances don’t actually cause cancer and that there are too many cancer-causing substances?

        • Tb0n3
          link
          English
          09 months ago

          Only the first half. If you put hundreds of chemicals that don’t cause cancer and label them in the group with a couple that do, the label is meaningless. Prop 65 labels are a joke.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            Maybe, i dont know enough about it. But idk, I just dont think it would be difficult to get rid of carcinogens.