• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    728 months ago

    I disagree, AAA especially would benefit fromsomeone with that kind of power at the helm. Most AAA games feel like committee games, no clear vision besides appealing to the lowest denominator. The reason Kojima games are so praised and polarizing is because he has this kind of power to make sure his vision gets realized.

    If everything has to go through Todd and the end result is Starfield then that just means Todd isn’t suited to have that much power.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      I would say that someone like Kojima is the outlier. There are not many developers like him that can make all the decisions about a game and make the right ones/make decisions that gamers actually agree with. Even Death Stranded wasn’t as big of a hit as people expected it to be. It has developed a large cult following, but it didn’t quite have the same fan appreciation when it launched.

      • @mnemonicmonkeys
        link
        English
        18 months ago

        There are not many developers like him that can make all the decisions about a game and make the right ones/make decisions that gamers actually agree with.

        Care to give any examples of devs in his position that don’t make good decisions?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Well Todd Howard is a good example. And I have very little faith in whatever Peter Molyneux puts out next. Thankfully there are many example because not many people are given the type of control over a game that this articles is talking about.

          • @mnemonicmonkeys
            link
            English
            08 months ago

            I personally don’t think Todd Howard is a good example to back your point