@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 8 months agoRule of 400lemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square235fedilinkarrow-up11.86Karrow-down15
arrow-up11.85Karrow-down1imageRule of 400lemmy.blahaj.zone@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 8 months agomessage-square235fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish67•8 months agoI think they meant a quarter of the population being illiterate, that is, that fact that such a statistic exists, is “fucking nuts,” not the illiterate population themselves.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•8 months agoWell he proceeded it by saying that they don’t “like” to read, implying that this is a choice on their part.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•8 months agoNot at all the way I read it, but I can see your thought train
minus-square@TheMightyCanucklink5•8 months agoHence it being a question. I wasn’t aware that access to learning to read wasn’t easily available. Stats on illiterate by choice vs socioeconomic standing would be very interesting
I think they meant a quarter of the population being illiterate, that is, that fact that such a statistic exists, is “fucking nuts,” not the illiterate population themselves.
Removed by mod
Well he proceeded it by saying that they don’t “like” to read, implying that this is a choice on their part.
Not at all the way I read it, but I can see your thought train
Hence it being a question. I wasn’t aware that access to learning to read wasn’t easily available.
Stats on illiterate by choice vs socioeconomic standing would be very interesting