When it comes to age on the ballot, Texas didn’t wait until 2024 to weigh in.

Asked to let judges stay on the bench until they’re 79 years old — a year younger than President Joe Biden — Texas voters soundly rejected the proposal in Tuesday’s elections, a defeat that drew new attention to issues of age and fitness for office in the U.S.

“Age is front of mind for American voters in a way that it has not traditionally been and they are nervous about it,” said Cal Jillson, a political science professor at Southern Methodist University.

Others cautioned against broader takeaways. At least four other states have rejected similar proposals over the last decade, according to the National Center for State Courts. And states that have passed the measures have mostly done so in close votes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      48 months ago

      How do you establish competency when the people you are measuring are the people putting the test on, grading it, choosing its metrics, and who define competency as “the thing Im doing right now, thank you very much”?

      Youre arguing for a vapid ideal that relies on politicians to not be politicians while they appraise themselves and one another.

      You basically want to give them a political cudgel to weaponize against political enemies because the concept gives you the warm and fuzzies.

      • be_excellent_to_each_other
        link
        fedilink
        -28 months ago

        How do you establish competency when the people you are measuring are the people putting the test on, grading it, choosing its metrics, and who define competency as “the thing Im doing right now, thank you very much”?

        So we don’t have ANYONE under your arbitrary line with enough experience and power to set such competency standards? No one at all?

        Youre arguing for a vapid

        On second thought, fuck you.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          38 months ago

          This would be a law. Politicians make, set, and edit laws.

          Anyone put into place could and would be replaced by politicians who wanted to make sure they pass the test.

          Youre relying on human failibility, and emotional weight. Your last sentence reinforcing that.

          You know what cant be bribed, blackmailed, or replaced by a politician without the public noticing? A hard line defined by the passage of time.

          But youve clearly run out of reasons to back your idea.

    • prole
      link
      English
      18 months ago

      I think we all like that idea better. In an ideal world. In reality, it just doesn’t work.