• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    This gets pointed out everytime a variation on this graphic gets posted, but it can work if the gears are on different planes, like they’re not all grinding up with one another. So maybe two gears are actually touching, but you’ve got a shaft going from the center of one of those connecting to another gear that’s actually touching the conflicting gear. Or it could be one of the gears is actually wide enough that it’s spinning two of the other ones, but those two aren’t touching.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      307 months ago

      I would argue that we have to be constrained by what is actually shown by the illustration and what is implied by it. It is implied that they all work together at the same time and if we’re just making up things that aren’t shown like an extra plane, we can make up anything.

      • @Peppycito
        link
        77 months ago

        A planetary gear set would have illustrated the point without breaking the laws of assumption.

    • Ech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      117 months ago

      Because the point of the illustration is that all of the gears are directly interacting with each other to achieve something. That gears don’t work that way either didn’t occur to the original creator, or they just didn’t care.

    • @0x4E4F
      link
      English
      27 months ago

      Why not just use a chain to circle them all 🤷… it’s even more fun to see that than this.