• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    257 months ago

    In the alternative universe we’d have been building fission power for decades when it was cheaper than renewables, and it would still be running today.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      In this universe we didn’t though, I’m not sure why the multiverse is relevant here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        127 months ago

        We were talking about power strategies from the 1980s and the person above said it would just be the “cheapest”. If countries really were just building the cheapest, it would not have been renewables back then.

        We were already talking about a counterfactual.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -27 months ago

          I guess. If we’re in this hypothetical alternative universe then those plants built in the 80’s would be at the end of their lives and we’d be looking to spend a fortune to replace them with new nuclear or we’d be saving money by building renewables.

          I’m still not sure what this line if discussion is accomplishing though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            77 months ago

            Probably nothing - though I do think it’s worth remembering that renewables were much more expensive in the past than they are now. It’s one reason why government action has been so slow - other reasons apply to nuclear power. I think people who are switched on to the crisis are all too aware that renewables are now easily the best source of power, but forget too easily that it was only through significant investment that we’ve ended up here.