The Supreme Court said Wednesday it will consider whether to restrict access to a widely used abortion drug — even in states where the procedure is still allowed.

The case concerns the drug mifepristone that — when coupled with another drug — is one of the most common abortion methods in the United States.

The decision means the conservative-leaning court will again wade into the abortion debate after overturning Roe v. Wade last year, altering the landscape of abortion rights nationwide and triggering more than half the states to outlaw or severely restrict the procedure.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    37 months ago

    The issue is that these agencies can have their heads appointed as a way of politically weaponizing them.

    For example appointing a new FBI head who would lead to a new ruling that unborn fetuses are people who would be protected by homicide laws.

    This skirts the legislative process to establish new laws. And aside from waiting until the next election the only recourse is commenting on the mater during a comment period.

    • prole
      link
      English
      -17 months ago

      That’s not how the FBI works. They enforce the laws passed by the legislative branch.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I know this isn’t the main point of this conversation but the idea that the FBI follows or has at any point since it’s inception followed the law in any meaningful sense is frankly hilarious.

        The FBI does whatever the hell it wants.