Godric@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agoWhat's your dream job?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square232fedilinkarrow-up1607arrow-down125
arrow-up1582arrow-down1imageWhat's your dream job?lemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agomessage-square232fedilink
minus-squareagamemnonymouslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoExactly why I didn’t bring it up. Still haven’t addressed the methodology of the “real” astrologers in that study, and again, still not relevant. Read this once again, slowly: I did not claim astrology was accurate. My claim was that it was not -always- vague. A report does not have to be accurate to be specific. You are arguing against a claim I did not make instead of the one I did make.
minus-squareTavarin@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoRead the paper. And just because you read something as specific does not make it specific. I already sent you information about the Barnum effect, which you repeatedly ignored. You know nothing of science, how dare you make any claims that I do not.
minus-squareagamemnonymouslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoThere it is again, diverting from my actual position to argue again something else. Since obviously you flunked middle school science: Precision =/= accuracy. You continue to argue against the accuracy of astrology, which was not a part of my position.
Exactly why I didn’t bring it up.
Still haven’t addressed the methodology of the “real” astrologers in that study, and again, still not relevant.
Read this once again, slowly:
I did not claim astrology was accurate.
My claim was that it was not -always- vague.
A report does not have to be accurate to be specific.
You are arguing against a claim I did not make instead of the one I did make.
Read the paper.
And just because you read something as specific does not make it specific. I already sent you information about the Barnum effect, which you repeatedly ignored.
You know nothing of science, how dare you make any claims that I do not.
There it is again, diverting from my actual position to argue again something else.
Since obviously you flunked middle school science:
Precision =/= accuracy. You continue to argue against the accuracy of astrology, which was not a part of my position.