Unfounded claims about offshore wind threatening whales have surfaced as a flashpoint in the fight over the future of renewable energy.

In recent months, conservatives including former President Donald Trump have claimed construction of offshore wind turbines is killing the giant animals.

Scientists say there is no credible evidence linking offshore wind farms to whale deaths. But that hasn’t stopped conservative groups and ad hoc “not in my back yard”-style anti-development groups from making the connection.

The Associated Press sorts fact from fiction when it comes to whales and wind power as the rare North Atlantic right whale’s migration season gets underway.

  • @starman2112
    link
    26 months ago

    I know it’s hard for the communist mind to understand commerce, but when you buy something from the store, that store buys more of that thing to fulfill the demand.

    While it’s true that the money I spend on soy milk and tofu goes into the same bank account as the money that pays for bacon and goat brains, stores are aware of what people are buying, and will likely not spend my lentil and black beans money on more dead animals.

    The money that you give them for your dead three month old chicken is money that they will spend on more three month old chickens, which those chickens’ producers will spend on making more chickens to kill at three months old. They will spend the money I gave them for my kale and spinach on more kale and spinach.

    • Sybil
      link
      fedilink
      06 months ago

      they don’t segregate the money. it’s fungible and all goes in the same pool. no one is responsible for the decisions they make except the people making the decisions.

      • @starman2112
        link
        26 months ago

        This is nonsense, and I think you know it. If you buy a chicken from the store, they will take your few dollars that you spent and spend it on another chicken to replace the one you bought. They may not keep track of which dollar bills were spent on chickens and only use those dollar bills to buy more, but that’s a meaningless distinction. You bought a chicken, and gave the company some number of dollars and now the company is going to spend some number of dollars more on chickens than it otherwise would have. You have paid the company to pay a farm to kill another chicken. You have, via the transitive property, paid for a farm to kill another chicken.

        • Sybil
          link
          fedilink
          06 months ago

          You have, via the transitive property, paid for a farm to kill another chicken.

          there is no transitive property, unless you think the people running the store and the farm have no free will. i don’t make their decisions for them.

          • @starman2112
            link
            16 months ago

            I know it’s you, commie, you’re the only one who replies like this. Did you get banned or something, and had to switch to an alt account?

            • Sybil
              link
              fedilink
              06 months ago

              you’re the only one who replies like this

              cogently, on-topic, and without personal attacks?

              • @starman2112
                link
                16 months ago

                Making an individual reply to every sentence in the parent comment, having the effect of spamming the thread with dozens and dozens of replies and chains that make it hard to keep track of what we’re actually arguing about.

                • Sybil
                  link
                  fedilink
                  06 months ago

                  i found meandering, multifaceted comments muddy the waters. I think the shorter comments keep it much clearer.

        • Sybil
          link
          fedilink
          06 months ago

          You bought a chicken, and gave the company some number of dollars and now the company is going to spend some number of dollars more on chickens than it otherwise would have.

          than it otherwise would have.

          this is a counterfactual. it cannot be proven

        • Sybil
          link
          fedilink
          06 months ago

          You have paid the company to pay a farm to kill another chicken.

          no. i paid for the food they had at that moment. there is no other transaction for which i am responsible.

        • Sybil
          link
          fedilink
          06 months ago

          If you buy a chicken from the store, they will take your few dollars that you spent and spend it on another chicken to replace the one you bought.

          assuming they are open long enough to place another order, and that they don’t decide to change their inventory levels and become vegan. frankly, i’m not responsible for what they decide in the future. they could take the money and close shop. it’s entirely up to them.

          • @starman2112
            link
            16 months ago

            If you keep buying chickens, they will not decide to become vegan. It is entirely up to them, just like it’s entirely up to my friend whether he buys me a burrito from taco bell after I cashapp him $5 for a burrito from taco bell. Worth noting, even though I only transfered $5 from my cashapp to his, and he spent $5 in paper money, I have still facilitated the transfer of $5 into taco bell’s bank account

            • Sybil
              link
              fedilink
              06 months ago

              this is totally disanalogous: no such contract exists between me and the store that has sold me something. I already have the product and they already have the money. if they close shop and run away with the money, that is just as valid as continuing to act as a retailer.