• @Skankboot
      link
      166 months ago

      The problem is they’re mediocre

      • lad
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        Sometimes mediocre will become better with time. If they do not make it mediocre they will likely make none rather than make outstanding right away.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      76 months ago

      Idk if that’s true, they oxidize easily. I would say brown ales or pale ales would be easier. IPAs sell, that’s why every small brewery has one

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        106 months ago

        They take less time to brew than a pilsner so when you only have a small capacity you can churn out more product if you’re targeting IPAs. This is generally why (beyond the general trend) microbreweries will opt for IPAs over lagers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          36 months ago

          I’ve brewed both styles. You’re right that lagering adds a step and not doing it adds significant time to the brewing process, but in terms of the volume at a brewery, that’s really only a one-off time delay. After it’s in a brewing rotation, lagering doesn’t add time to a production schedule. It’s more about storage space and equipment at that point.

          IPAs can be significantly more difficult to brew, so if you’re talking about a one-off brew, IPAs are harder to make WELL but faster to brew. Pilsner is easier to make well, but can take longer and/or require an additional step (lagering).

      • Captain Aggravated
        link
        26 months ago

        The recipe is two parts tylenol to one part bud light, judging by the flavor profile of most IPA’s I’ve tried.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      Pale ales are easier and cheaper to make than IPAs. They make IPAs because they are popular, not because they are easy.