• agamemnonymous
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Didn’t say that. Un-nuanced universal anti-natalism is extremism.

    • zaph
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      No one mentioned that but you. No one here is asking for that or suggesting it.

      • agamemnonymous
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        That is the implication of

        not having kids, is the best environmental friendly option of them all.

        • zaph
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          You read that and you think the writer meant “all humans should stop reproducing?” That’s a you problem.

          • agamemnonymous
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Framing not having kids as conscientious means only the unconscientious will have kids. That is an everyone problem.

            • zaph
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              “I’d guess that having children, in the long run is more environmentally harmful than you eating meat the rest of your life.” =/= “people who have kids are bad people”

              you’re starting to come across as someone who is only in this discussion because you feel personally attacked and since you haven’t I’m done conversing with you

              • agamemnonymous
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Don’t know how you jumped to that conclusion, but okay.