• @Secret300
    cake
    link
    English
    66 months ago

    About fucking time. I started playing battlefield for the destruction and 2042 had less destruction than bad company 2

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46 months ago

      Pretty much every BF since BC2 has had less destruction than BC2 and for good reason, flattening the entire map makes for very boring gameplay. IMO BF3 and BF4 hit the sweet spot of having enough destruction to have an impact while still maintaining some modicum of level design.

      But now I don’t even play battlefield and I probably won’t return until the destruction is on par with the Finals.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 months ago

        BC2 still flourished with destroyed environments. The level wasn’t completely flattened in every match, and it really felt like you were part of some epic battle. It was the perfect amount of “levolution”. BF3 was a huge downgrade, and BF4 even more so. The Battlefield series has absolutely lost its way, and needs to stop trying to be both Siege and Call of Duty at the same time.

      • @sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        English
        16 months ago

        IDK, The Finals looks pretty fun and they allow complete destruction of the map.