• @ArbitraryValue
      link
      English
      26
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That’s an interesting question. I think in the real world, being a furry is perceived as an off-putting fetish because anthropomorphic animals are imaginary. In a world where anthropomorphic animals were real, I think it would be relatively common for people to be attracted to them, so your character would probably just be considered normal.

      Playing that character still makes you a furry. Sorry.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        75 months ago

        I’m not a furry for playing a tabaxi! I mean, I very much am a furry, but playing a tabaxi has nothing to do with it

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        You say that, but people being attracted to the same gender in the real world are still demonized. It wasn’t that long ago (and is still an issue in some places) that interracial relationships were looked down on and even illegal.

        So eventually it would be considered normal, but I think it would take a while.

      • lad
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        That will really depend on how xenophobic the setting is. If it’s anywhere near IRL level interspecies attraction will be stated to be OK only in some places and will be frowned upon by many

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      55 months ago

      Depends on if the setting has a subculture analogous to and named “furry”. For standard D&D probably not.

    • @mindbleach
      link
      35 months ago

      Do they have a Tabaxsona?

      … would that look like a crude in-universe character sheet?