VATICAN CITY (CNS) – People who act shocked that a priest would bless a gay couple but have no problem with him blessing a crooked businessman are hypocrites, Pope Francis said.

“The most serious sins are those that are disguised with a more ‘angelic’ appearance. No one is scandalized if I give a blessing to an entrepreneur who perhaps exploits people, which is a very serious sin. Whereas they are scandalized if I give it to a homosexual – this is hypocrisy,” he told the Italian magazine Credere.

The interview was scheduled for publication Feb. 8, but Vatican News reported on some of its content the day before when the magazine issued a press release about the interview.

  • SreudianFlip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Millions of people is a pretty good dataset for statistical reliability. That country can be considered a useful example of what’s possible.

      • SreudianFlip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why not? What are your assumptions about diversity in the context of the range of emotions and political tendencies?

        • Zeroxxx@lemmy.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          How is this case political?

          Again, one country’s population does not represent 7 billion people. That is a fact. Those who say otherwise should check their math’s grade.

          • SreudianFlip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Is it a fact because you want it to be, or are you some kind of statistics savant? It doesn’t represent the planet anthropologically, but it does psychologically, and whether it is possible for a population to drop organized religion is about brains not tradition.

            • Zeroxxx@lemmy.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Small part*.

              Like I said, like a broken record, statistics need to be representative.

              This case you brought up, is not.

              • SreudianFlip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Yes, it is, psychologically. You only need a few thousand to be highly accurate.

                Individuals can drop attachments to organized religion. The example given, if true, can be seen as evidence. If you are making an anthropological argument that there’s a fundamental and practically immutable psychological difference between societies, you should say so, and address the occasional rapid shifts in social structures evident in modern history.

                So far, you merely assert, with no explanation about your terms of reference.

                • Zeroxxx@lemmy.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Lol yeah you wish.

                  Have fun with your delusion, you clearly know nothing about statistics.

                  This is my last message, bye.