Seine-Port is introducing restrictions on phone use in streets, shops and parks – but young people say there’s little else to do

A picture of a smartphone with a red line through it serves as a warning in the window of a hairdresser’s shop in a French village that has voted to ban people scrolling on their phones in public. “Everyone is struggling with too much screen time,” said Ludivine, a cardiology nurse, as she had her hair cut into a bob, leaving her phone out of sight in her bag. “I voted in favour, this could be a solution.”

Seine-Port, in the Seine-et-Marne area south of Paris, with a population of fewer than 2,000 people, last weekend voted yes in a referendum to restrict smartphone use in public, banning adults and children from scrolling on their devices while walking down the street, while sitting with others on a park bench, while in shops, cafes or eating in restaurants and while parents wait for their children in front of the school gates. Those who might check their phone’s map when lost are instead being encouraged to ask for directions.

The village has also approved a charter for families on children’s use of screens: no screens of any kind in the morning, no screens in bedrooms, no screens before bed or during meals. If parents of teenagers sign a written agreement not to give their child a smartphone before the age of 15, the town hall will provide the child with an old-fashioned handset for calls only.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    45 months ago

    This isn’t a minor violation. It’s completely, unforgivably, obscene.

    I think you’re being a little hyperbolic here. They aren’t rounding up people and arresting them for pulling their phones out of their pockets. The article literally says-

    It is not enforceable by police – officers could not stop or fine people scrolling in the street because there is no national law against smartphones – but the mayor describes it as an incitement to stop scrolling and guidance for limiting phone use.

    And the majority of the town voted for it.

    So I’m really not seeing the issue here.

    • conciselyverbose
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      I’m not. I’m dead serious.

      Having the law on the books, without enforcement, should get their charter revoked. It is not acceptable.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        If you are dead serious, and a non-enforceable ordinance that a majority of the voted in favor of in a democratic election is “completely, unforgivably, obscene,” I guess you’re more a fan of dictatorships.

        • conciselyverbose
          link
          fedilink
          55 months ago

          It doesn’t matter if every single person in the town voted to put a rule on the books taking away a basic freedom.

          Opposing aggressively authoritarian violations of basic human autonomy is not supporting dictatorship. There are some things a government unconditionally should not have the capacity to restrict. Being a modern human using basic modern tools is one of them.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            -15 months ago

            Again- no one’s freedom is being taken away. You can stand in the middle of town and spend hours looking straight at your phone and not a single person can do a thing to stop you.

            I agree that there are some things a government shouldn’t have the capacity to restrict. Nothing is being restricted here.

            • conciselyverbose
              link
              fedilink
              45 months ago

              The fact that the law is on the books is a restriction completely independent of any enforcement.

              It cannot possibly be acceptable.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                -15 months ago

                I’m sorry, you’re getting worked up over a nothingburger and acting like a small town in France is akin to North Korea or something.