@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 5 months agoThey had a paid break, right?pawb.socialimagemessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up11.11Karrow-down111
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageThey had a paid break, right?pawb.social@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 5 months agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink18•5 months agoAt least with your assembly code it’ll go brrrrrrrt because of how fast it’ll be.
minus-squareℍ𝕖𝕝𝕝𝕤𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕞𝕪linkfedilink9•5 months agoI always have problems with assembly. Especially after being at Ikea.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•5 months agoA pal in tech school did code golf in assembly. There are people like that.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•5 months agoIf you know that you do. What you probably do not. A proper C/C++ compiler (gcc) will almost always produce better/more optimized ASM than a human ever could.
minus-square@UnRelatedBurnerlink7•5 months agoit reaches ‘t’ from ‘b’ with a lot less iterations of ‘r’. It seems to me that you have a more optimized version. :)
At least with your assembly code it’ll go brrrrrrrt because of how fast it’ll be.
Assuming it actually works
I always have problems with assembly. Especially after being at Ikea.
A pal in tech school did code golf in assembly. There are people like that.
If you know that you do. What you probably do not. A proper C/C++ compiler (gcc) will almost always produce better/more optimized ASM than a human ever could.
My assembly code only goes brt :(
it reaches ‘t’ from ‘b’ with a lot less iterations of ‘r’. It seems to me that you have a more optimized version. :)
Maybe you switched up
jgandjl?/s