spoiler

alt text: A two panel comic. In the first panel there are two buttons labeled “I don’t believe in prescriptivism” and “‘Literally’ cannot mean ‘figuratively’”. A finger hovers between the buttons. In the second panel, the finger’s owner is sweating and wiping his brow, unable to decide.

  • starman2112
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    You know how I said language doesn’t work properly without context? You don’t have to ask for context when someone tells you something. I struggle to think of a situation where it isn’t obvious in the moment whether someone means “literally” literally or figuratively. For example, “I’m literally suffocating.” Did you actually think about the reality of a situation where someone tells you this? You can just look at a person and know whether they’re struggling to breathe.

    I admit that if someone sends a text that reads “I’m literally suffocating” without any context, then that’s not very useful, but that just works further to my point that context matters.

    • merc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I admit that if someone sends a text that reads “I’m literally suffocating” without any context

      Exactly.

      • starman2112
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        but that just works further to my point that context matters.

        Have some reading glasses 👓

        • merc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I never denied that context matters, my point is that few words are that ambiguous without context.