• xmunk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 个月前

    Considering that business was basically run by his children for a while it’s extremely disappointing to see them excluded from the judgement.

    • PorradaVFR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      10 个月前

      Both boys have to pay $4m and can’t run NY businesses for 3 years. Not nothing - although I did not see anything about Ivanka.

      • eestileib
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 个月前

        They’re also “jointly and severally liable” for the major amounts of cash, I have no idea what that means though.

        • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 个月前

          It means they can pay jointly, but each is liable for the whole amount.

          As in, if Trump claims to be broke, either son could be forced to pay whatever is outstanding, they can’t limit their liability to one third.

          • eestileib
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 个月前

            Sounds like a perfect excuse for them to all fuck around and endlessly point the finger at one another and whine about things not being fair.

            So (assuming non payment, which seems reasonable), the winning side can just start putting liens on property and freezing bank accounts as they see fit among the liable people, up to the judgment amount?

            • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 个月前

              Not really, kind of the opposite actually. As in there’s no fucking around because the judge already said each of them can be forced to cough it all up.

              If they don’t pay on time then yes, the court can take liens on whichever assets are the easiest to get at.

              • eestileib
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 个月前

                Seems to me that the news coverage of this is mostly misleading.

                Thanks.

      • xmunk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 个月前

        Ah, I should read better - thanks!

    • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      10 个月前

      One, the kids are also barred for a period of time.

      Two, the big kicker is:

      He also continued “the appointment of an Independent Monitor” and ordered “the installation of an Independent Director of Compliance” for the company

      There is going to be eyes and ears on everything Trump attempts to do to weasel money around, especially given how often Trump shifts funds illegally to maintain his grift. That monitor is absolutely going to be dragging Trump back into court sooner or later. The man knows no restraint, he’s absolutely going to FAFO.