• admiralteal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Can’t wait for the day a major court declares EULAs universally nonbinding outside of the most common-sense terms. Even though I doubt it will ever happen.

        “We can store and display your content and use stuff you publicly post as examples in advertisements for our platform” is pretty common sense.

        “We can use the things you post to do complex data analytics to package and sell your identity to advertisers” is fucking sus.

        “We can use the things you post to train ANN generative systems to build next-generation technologies to impersonate you and your peers” is simply nuts.

        The idea that displaying an EULA with an “agree” button is informed consent is just preposterous. Even lawyers don’t read them.

        • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Seems like it would never stand up in court. Prove that -I- agreed to anything. To do that, you first have to prove that nobody has ever created an account under my name, and more importantly, prove that Reddit accounts have never been hacked and that the person who clicked the button was even in my household. And if they keep that extensive of records to where they can follow every action taken by every user on the platform, it also implies that they are tracking my personal actions even before I agreed to anything.

          On the other hand, do they actually have a EULA? It’s been almost 14 years since I created my account, and there certainly wasn’t anything about selling my data for AI training when I signed up. If they change the terms of service, they are responsible for notifying everyone, otherwise they can’t claim that anyone agreed to these changes.

          I’m sure their lawyers could weasel their way through it some how, but it still seems to come down to them claiming they changed the agreement without notification but the users should still be legally bound by the new terms?

      • DudeImMacGyver
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well tell him to play it better because he sucks at that too.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      The classic “screw everyone else, I want mine.”

      What fraction of a penny do you think you’re owed?

      • DudeImMacGyver
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        What fraction of a penny do you think you’re owed?

        250,000,000/1

        Hey, you didn’t specify that it couldn’t be an improper fraction and I like money. It’s loophole time baby!

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      It went toward paying for servers so that you could use reddit for free.