I always assumed credit scores were an integral and historic part of the American financial system.

They were not, they are very recent,most of your parents didn’t have credit scores growing up, and as you can probably tell or at least intuit, it’s mostly just a b******* scheme for those with capital to accrue more capital by invading your privacy.

  • @VarykOP
    link
    English
    -5
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Your hypothesis is that before computers and data centers were used in business to cross-reference, centralize, analyze and store private and public data, and before a personal credit rating system was implemented, businesses were using cross referenced, centralized, analyzed mountains of paper files on all potential consumers nationwide, directly related to their business or not, to calculate 300+ million personal credit scores that didn’t exist yet?

    You’re taking more than a leap, you’re jumping right off the cliff.

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Uh, okay then. Damn I’m old. Apparently. 🧐 Funny though that the younger generation cannot imagine how life worked pre-personal-computers (or even before computers entirely).

      • @VarykOP
        link
        English
        -34 months ago

        It’s the same with each generation. You probably didn’t have to take academic tests on how many bushels of carrots you could bring to market a week because you weren’t educated as a yeoman, as previous generations to you were, when that data was more relevant.

        I think the younger generation understands how things worked before computers became widespread, but it isn’t relevant to there life or much of the current global order, so it isn’t at the forefront of their mind.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 months ago

      No, you’re just taking a binary view of history.

      • before there was any transparency, decisions were made based on your credit score and report, but it was tough to argue when they didn’t have to tell you why
      • before there were standard scores and reports, there were still computers and networks. Each bank did similar by themselves
      • before there was centralized banking records per corporation, they had to collect similar data about you and each bank had policies for a banker to decide
      • @VarykOP
        link
        English
        04 months ago
        1. Yes, before you had a predetermined credit score, your credit score was assessed on a case-by-case basis. I don’t know why you think things are transparent now.

        2. Computers are not as old as you think they are.

        3. Yes, before you had a predetermined credit score, your credit score was assessed on a case-by-case basis.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          There is transparency to the extent that the decision is based almost entirely on your credit score and credit record. You can see a copy of your credit record any time, which is a fairly new thing. You can see similar credit scores and if they turn you down for anything they are required to tell you what it was. While you may not know the calculation, you know what goes into it at least well enough. Most importantly the decision is mostly objective and consistent, by computer, driven by this data. It’s not entirely transparent but more so than at any time in history

          • @VarykOP
            link
            English
            14 months ago

            The decision should be based entirely on your credit score on record, which is determined by factors out of one’s control.

            You can assume what goes into your credit score, but the more important point is that you don’t and that is proprietary information owned by a very small amount of companies that profit from your information.

            Given the above, I can’t come to the conclusion that determining your individual value based on circumstances out of your control is objective.

            As for consistency, if you get sick and accrue hospital bills you can’t immediately pay, your credit rating plummets. That doesn’t sound very consistent, relevant, or objective.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      uh… that’s exactly how it worked. The Wikipedia page you linked mentions credit bureaus. If you go to that page you can see they were established in the USA by the mid 1800s. Yes, it was all done on paper. That’s how the world used to work.

      • @VarykOP
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        No, that is not how it was done. Before, The time was put in to assess the relevant data your creditworthiness.

        Today if you break a leg and have a hospital bill, your chances of receiving credit are automatically lowered.

        There’s a huge difference between being investigated for credit worthiness and automatically being assigned a score filled with arbitrary private data irrelevant to debt or credit.

        Are you a racial minority? Your credit score probably isn’t as good as a white guy’s credit score.

        https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/files/2022067pap.pdf

        Assessing relevant data on an individual’s debt risk makes sense.

        Collecting everybody’s private information so that three companies can determine, without ever meeting you or knowing anything about you, teally, the amount you are allowed to succeed or take advantage opportunities is b*******.

        The 19th century credit bureaus and today’s credit ratings are completely different.