The proposed rules will criminalize the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, including deepfakes made by AI tools, which could help deter revenge porn.

The proposed rules will criminalize the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, including deepfakes made by AI tools, which could help deter revenge porn.

  • @DeceptichumEnglish
    1•4 months ago

    The article has no mention of criminalising AI generated porn, only deepfakes?

    • roastedDeflator
      1•4 months ago

      To my understanding it does?

      The proposed rules will criminalize the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, including deepfakes made by AI tools, which could help deter revenge porn. Cyber-stalking, online harassment, misogynous hate speech and “cyber-flashing,” or the sending of unsolicited nudes, will also be recognized as criminal offenses.

      • @DeceptichumEnglish
        1•4 months ago

        Where does it mention AI generated porn in that? AI generated deeepfakes, sure but not catch-all AI porn.

        For example if someone made some AI hentai porn, what part of that sentence would imply that’s going to be criminalised, because I can’t see it in there.

        • nevernevermore
          1•4 months ago

          I think it’s more about the “non-consensual” part of the first sentence in the article. Ai generated porn of nobody in particular=probably fine. Ai generated porn of a real life person=probably unethical.

        • roastedDeflator
          1•4 months ago

          I think I see your point. It looks like this proposal is related to humans specifically, not artwork.