• Varyk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yes, mine is a different, or accurately, a more comprehensive take.

    I do address your quoted concern here briefly in the second paragraph of my earlier comment.

    “China will eventually be able to compete in the mass semiconductor commercial market fort non-essential chips, but are about as far away from today’s advanced chip manufacturing as your '99 iMac is from the Oculus Rift.”

    Maybe even as far away as a calculator is from the rift.

    Chinese chutzpah isn’t as important here as the actual technological gaps and rarity of the software processes and absolutely globally unique fabs of tsmc.

    It’s not a matter of wanting it, the practical, actual limitations of the endeavor mean something severely phenomenal, miraculous or devastating is going to have to happen for the Chinese to close any sort of chip gap in the “few years” you predict.

    • grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      A lot can happen in ten years these days. For some reason I always have to state this every time this topic comes up: I never said it was going to be easy. It’s not going to be fast. It is going to happen, though.

      • Varyk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Changing your assessment from “a few years” to “ten years” makes it more likely China could catch up, sure, and is very different from what you originally said.

        I haven’t made the claim you think it’s easy, I said that the technical challenges the Chinese are facing developing new chip technologies are not at all the same challenges as your example of Japanese developing better methods for manufacturing common global products.

        Reorganizing the company error-reporting structure, like Japan did with Toyota, is not going to help China develop advanced chips.

        Modern chipmaking is a task orders of magnitude more difficult working with technologies orders of magnitude smaller, with a minute and unique knowledge and manufacturing base aware of Chinese corporate statecraft and committed to not leaking their newest processes. Those sources also have the best research teams and research development technology globally.

        The technology is not linear. They cannot continue making smaller chips following an iterative, logical process and throwing more man hours at it. If the sanctions remain effective and China is unable to pull off a stunning degree of corporate statecraft, they will have to come up with entirely new processes on the atomic scale.

        “It is going to happen.”

        What is? China matching TSMC’s current chipmaking capabilities, at which point TSMC will be years ahead again?

        It conceivably could, in your new timeline of a decade rather than the few years you predicted earlier.

        Must it? Not at all.

        • grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          You have adequately demonstrated your knowledge. Ten years is not that long. It’s happening. We should prepare for it, not deny the reality which is what most do.

          • Varyk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            “It’s happening?”

            If you mean that China is attempting to close the semiconductor manufacturing gap, that’s correct.

            If you mean that they are closing that gap, that’s baseless.

            There’s no evidence that they are any closer to closing that gap in manufacturing advanced microchips even with the billions of dollars they’ve poured into the industry since before US sanctions began.

            The forum users you were talking about may not be preparing for the Chinese investment in semiconductor infrastructure, but the u.s government has been for years.

            We didn’t invite TSMC to set up in Arizona because we wanted a cool company in our backyard. It’s directly related to the imposed sanctions and the knowledge that China will attempt to close that gap.

            Biden isn’t investing tens of billions of dollars into chip manufacturing on a whim, it’s a deliberate preemptive response to what has obviously been coming for a while with Taiwan refusing to integrate with China and holding such technological superiority over China.

            • grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              You don’t have go do nuts with the details, I read the same articles. I’m just saying this is in the process of happening and people are denying the reality in general.

              Example: https://lemmy.world/comment/8043602

              Example: there’s a person in this thread insisting that Chinese people do not have a way to say “yes”. It’s… weird, to be charitable.

              • Varyk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                Based on your positions so far, it doesn’t seem like your vague “this” is happening at all.

                It isn’t weird that Chinese languages don’t have a word for “yes”, different languages have different rules.

                It’s just as weird and normal that you don’t use gendered nouns while writing English.