• MarcoPOLOOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    9 months ago

    Protesting your primary legislative body? Illegal.

    • horsey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can protest all you want outside. Someone would get kicked out of a school board meeting for this. Free speech means the government can’t arrest you for the content of what you say or restrict political assembly.

      • MarcoPOLOOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        9 months ago

        Congress shall make no law […] abridging the freedom […] to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

        • oxjox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

          It is legal to peaceably petition the government for a redress of grievances.
          It is illegal to disrupt the Congress and demonstrate in the Congressional buildings.

        • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yet another moronic comment from you. Having the right to petition the government does not mean you can disrupt official proceedings and refuse to leave when ordered to by the police. It’s the content of speech that’s protected, you can’t go to jail for saying Biden sucks…you can go to jail for disrupting official proceedings and trespassing. You’re pretending the right to free speech gives one the right to conduct that speech however they want, and that is again…an incredibly stupid thing to suggest.

          • oxjox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            How bizarre is it that people simply choose to misinterpret plain English?

            One law says you can peacefully petition, the other says you can not be disruptive and obstructive.

            This should not be something anyone finds arguable.

        • horsey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Good job, but our rights don’t include standing up and screaming during official proceedings. It’s more that the government can’t arrest him for writing an op-ed or Twitter feed criticizing Biden.

          • MarcoPOLOOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            9 months ago

            I don’t think you understand what the first amendment actually claims

            • horsey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              It does not guarantee the right to disrupt official proceedings, sorry. Like I said, go try that in a court. Walk in and start protesting about a political issue and claim you’re allowed to under the 1st amendment. This isn’t exactly the first time someone has tried that btw.