• @kakes
    link
    31 year ago

    Surprisingly I’ve never heard of “computational physics” (as a specific field), but it sounds intensely interesting.

    I completely agree, though. You can’t look at a modern transistor (no really - you can’t) and tell me it isn’t some form of sorcery.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t tell my parents, but “Computational Physics”, at least as implemented by my uni, was just a random mashup of physics, “pure” math, and programming classes. The idea is supposed to be specialization in creating simulation software, but unfortunately bridging the gap between intro to Java and C++ classes, and creating sophisticated simulation software does not really happen naturally for most people (me, I’m specifically talking about me)

      It sounds very impressive on a resume though.

      • @kakes
        link
        31 year ago

        Well I’m still impressed, honestly. I took computer science, and I would have loved to lean further on the math/physics side. I’m one of those people that wants to know how a machine works from scratch, as foolish as that is, haha.

        • I Cast Fist
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I recently saw a video that showed how the lightbulbs led to the invention of transistors, can’t remember the title or channel, but it was really interesting.

          Seems that starting with 1800’s early electric technology makes it much easier to understand current, super miniaturized and specialized tech

          • @kakes
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Oh hey, I think I’ve seen the video you’re talking about (and also can’t remember the channel). Super interesting for sure.

            I’ve always wanted to know how to create a simple computer entirely from scratch (in case of a time machine situation), but creating even a crude transistor from scratch is actually really hard, it turns out.