• ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What kind of perspective does one need to have to believe it is good when there are no resources (money, people) to care for the elderly?

    • meat_popsicle
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’ll save money on out-of-control healthcare costs if the elderly just died instead of lingered. A tree needs to have the dead or dying branches pruned or they’ll endanger the trunk. The elderly are willing to sacrifice themselves for the economy; that’s what the Lt. Governor of Texas said during COVID.

      Not supporting this perspective, but I’ve heard social darwinists say “the weak should fear the strong” and other horrid shit unironically.

      • ANGRY_MAPLE
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        These types people always talk as if they’re immune to sudden, life-changing events. It’s all fun and games until some random a-hole hits you while driving drunk and makes you permanently disabled. Maybe you’re unlucky and have your entire city/neighbourhood burn down from an uncontrolled wildfire.

      • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know this type of scary talk. It also comes up when people talk about assisted suicide. Some people on the fringe believe it would be a good option for addicts, the homeless, etc.

        They believe it’s a rational standpoint. In reality they ignore the consequence this approach would have for our society on a psychological level.

        • Ataraxia
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I shoukd always have the right to choosing a comfortable death though. Otherwise I’ll have to go walk into the woods and hope mother nature isn’t cruel that day.