• goldenbough@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Renting over owning is a more stable outlay (no “surprise, you need a new water heater” expenses for renters) and it gives flexibility for moving with any kind of frequency. I agree that home ownership should be more attainable and affordable, but it’s not a clean win 100% of the time for everyone.

    • Arbiter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re still paying for the water heater, the expense is just hidden over long term inflated rent prices.

      • goldenbough@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, a buffer built into the rental price (“inflated” is a loaded term; rents can be inflated, but a rental price set to cover mortgage and amortized expenses isn’t by definition inflated), but it’s still stable.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, also way more stable in countries where you are not protected by the law and may be told get outta the property you’re renting less than a month in advance. And in countries where you’re protected, the landlord will usually get in your arse checking if you’re a fraud, this makes renting quite a bit more of a problem.