• Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They do, but the scientific phrasing is “ritual purposes”.

  • El Barto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t get it. How are the archeology articles written, then?

    Edit: I get it now.

    • Knusper@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Humans have this tendency of assuming everyone else is dumb. Whether that’s their neighbor, a different generation, a foreign nation, different skin colors, different religions, different species or indeed extinct civilizations, pretty much everyone is assumed to be barbaric, until proven otherwise.

      And so, yeah, it’s usually a revelation like wow, they had calendars, they must have actually been smarter than we thought.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Got it. Thanks. And yup, I agree. I’ve always found silly that people are stunned that others in the past had complex knowledge. Like, bitch, the way you live now is thanks to the efforts of those in the past.

        Imagine people 2000 years from today, using quantum tech for a lot of things, AI, transportation, etc, saying “whoa, can you believe it?! They already had hadron colliders in the 2000s! WHOA!” Then we’d be like, “bitch, all those things you’re enjoying in your time is thanks to us. We are the ones who should be impressed, not the other way around. Like, you’re still using microwaves to cook stuff?!?!?! Whoa!”