Further, spokespeople and attorneys at the agency said that disclosing the names of all the state’s officers could lead to the identification of those working undercover.
The stupid excuses they come up with. So, they’re working undercover, but using their real names and exposing data that can be linked to their actual identity?
Police and transparency experts have also cast doubts on the argument that releasing comprehensive certification data would compromise the identities of undercover officers and their investigations.
If you don’t do anything wrong you won’t have anything to hide, officers.
Didn’t even know that 15 states kept their officers information private. That’s f****** nuts.
I can’t find a full list of the 15
https://coloradonewsline.com/2023/09/20/colorado-minority-police-officer-data-secret/
Besides Colorado, legal appeals have been filed in New York, Michigan, and Utah.
So
-
Arkansas
-
Colorado
-
New York
-
Michigan
-
Utah
-
Do they wear identification or like how do you even know they’re cops at a certain point?
Could I use defend my castle laws against a random person in a cop uniform who won’t tell me his/her name?
Well, yeah. Arkansas is a shit hole state.
Only the names are changed to protect the guilty?
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
