• taladar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would you ban anyone who truly deserves it (e.g. for cheating or harassment or sexual harassment) for anything less than forever? What would you gain from giving them a chance to come back other than a high chance for more moderator headaches?

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pshh you’re being downvoted but fuck that. If a ban is legit, make it permanent. Cheating? Shouting slurs at folks? Fuck off, banned forever. Companies used to do that, now they’re WEAK

      • taladar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it came with no downsides, sure. Not being able to play Playstation is a very minor part in life not really deserving any kind of “fundamental rights” based argument, unlike locking people up.

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            But you didn’t purchase them, you licensed them conditionally.

              • null@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                In other words, no you do not currently have a fundamental right to that content.

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  In other words, no not even close to what I said.

                  Often these little legalese situations are illegal or legally undefined, and the only reason it holds is because no one has pushed against it

    • LapGoat@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      hi, sometimes people get banned for no reason.

      if they’re a repeat offender, ban them again easy.

      otherwise, nah.

      people let their siblings, children, friends play on their consoles.

      • taladar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, there should absolutely be ways to appeal a ban if you have a legitimate argument, but making it temporary for everyone is just insane.

        • LapGoat@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          bans are already temporary in the sense that offenders can acquire new accounts, hardwares, or networks to circumvent them anyway. all that permanent bans does is guarantee that people who are falsely banned, arent repeat offenders, or even got hacked themselves get permanantly banned.

          appeal processes arent a guarantee to getting an account back.

          Games have much more strict bans than they need imo.

          a lot of terrible chat filters have gotten people permabanned and thats kinda just it. im here for no permanent bans.