• nieceandtows@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That was some great explanation, thank you! That really helps me see the poem differently. I don’t think everything is random about songs, but songs are more obvious for me to understand why they are structured the way they are, where are poetry like this is a bit baffling, probably because I’m not a native speaker.

    • funkless_eck
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      there’s more history feeding these kind of decisions as well. When you’re writing - as Shakespeare did - in blank verse, you have to end the line after 5 iambic feet (ten syllables). Shakespeare is considered the king of this because of how he does it.

      “Friends. Romans. Countrymen. Lend me your ears.”

      10 syllables but the speaker is trying to attract the attention of a large crowd. He’s counting. Friends (1). Romans (2). Countrymen (3). Lend me your ears (4).

      In Othello, Iago says

       For when my outward action doth demonstrate
       The native act and figure of my heart
       In complement extern, 'tis not long after
       But I will wear my heart upon my sleeve
       For daws to peck at. I am not what I am.
      

      Note how the line breaks are sense breaks too. So Shakespeare is skillfully obeying the meter while also lining up the sense of the underlying message.

      There’s even the same tension/release device of the undressing from the above poem in the last two lines (when I wear my heart on my sleeve… … …it gets eaten by birds!)

      When you don’t have a strict meter (in the same way that modern music nowadays doesn’t obey the Sonata form, or the symphony form) you can be more inventive with how you’re using form and format to create your work.