• dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “we’re talking about the rate of fire being 800 or even 1,000 or more rounds a minute. Think about how many bullets that is.”

    Um yes that’s a fast fire rate but unless you have a 800 round magazine (which would probably be the size of a small microwave) slid into your Glock, you aren’t firing that many bullets.

    • Tar_Alcaran
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, there are 50 round drum mags for glocks, and even a 100 round (350 dollar) double drum for some insane reason. That’s probably begging for a 1 rpm fire rate though.

      • SheeEttin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That assumes they won’t jam after the fifth round. Nobody uses drum mags because they’re so unreliable.

    • oDDmON@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, achieving that kind of firing rate without muzzle cooling would result in a literal meltdown, sooner rather than later.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not important in terms of sustained fire. It’s important because at that rate you are going to rip the person you are shooting at (if you can).

      It makes it more deadly than trying to pull the trigger real fast with accuracy. Achievable with lots of training.

      There is a reason Glock and Beretta have designed pistols that do this out of the factory for police and military.

      • Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s also a reason the police and military don’t buy pistols like this, you can’t hit what you’re aiming at, and the gun will be empty in less than 2 seconds. Generally unsafe for all involved including the shooter.

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, they probably liked the potential of a pocket machine gun but in practice saw that it was rarely practical.

          There are some seriously compact machine pistols with deployable braces which are likely much better choices today.