• ddkman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know. It looks more aesthetically consistent. Your computer has to display something. Average users would be scared if it dumped logs on the display. so the vendor logo makes sense. It COULD just say loading, but this is a bit pedantic I think.

    • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      When it comes to security, particularly at boot time, fuck the user. Users don’t interact with devices at boot time so it doesn’t matter if it shows a blank screen, a mile of logs or a screaming clown penis. If it was up to users no device or service would have a password or security of any kind, and every byte of information about your life would be owned by 'The Cloud." Let the marketing wanks insert their logo into the Windows boot process,

      • 0xD@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I want to insert my own logo into the boot process, and I want these ducking vendors to properly validate and assess their mother ducking software. But nooo, penetration tests and any remediations are too expensive for these pieces of bit. Why do it when you can just stick your dick in everyone’s face, right?

        Fuck.

    • azertyfun
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      ??

      With BIOS, it goes “Motherboard Logo -> OS Logo”

      With UEFI, it goes “Motherboard Logo -> Motherboard Logo”

      Sure, it’s more consistent, but the alternative is not user unfriendly, the only people it’s unfriendly to is the marketing wankers at Dell, Lenovo, Acer, etc.