• Imgonnatrythis
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    No it hasn’t. Many religions and spiritual texts covered all this stuff in just a couple of pages.

      • no banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The Bible says something about the earth and how it is good and the filament of the sky and something. The Bible that is, at least that’s what I read on the internet. Many fine people on the internet, the best people, but not me, I haven’t said it, but the best people probably. The best people say the earth may be - and I’m not saying it is but they are saying it - they say that the earth may be flat and that doesn’t take much text to cover I have heard.

      • bigfish@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you squint a little, the 7 days of creation in Genesis are relativistic-ish. 1 day to separate light from darkness (photons at 1 microsecond after Big Bang), another to create the sky (opaque universe at 370k years), another to form dry land and create life (earth formed, 9.3 billion years, life at ~0.2by later), etc etc. Anyone with a physics degree able to say what fraction of light speed god must have been travelling to make this happen such that only days passed for them between these events?

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are missing the point. The creation myths were considered complete. Nothing left to be known.

      • Imgonnatrythis
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Deal if you show me the scientific texts that covered these in 500bc since you think we’ve always know how complex this is.

        • XIN@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If your point was that religions have oversimplified complex science to the point that people thought they fully grasped it, then I agree with you. Otherwise I have no idea what you are trying to say.