• NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is what a “Death Panel” looks like. Odd, because the GOP spent the last decade saying single payer health care and abortion rights would lead to death panels. Turns out they just wanted to be the ones running the death panels. Flee the south! Flee red states! I know their are naysayers that want people to stay so they turn the areas blue. But my argument is those areas had their chances to get basic human compassion correct and they fail every time. They will never ever agree with the will of the people and will go back on any bill passed that protects marginalized communities. The only way they will “see the light” is if they look around their states and see no women; see no educated individuals; see no hard working youths; and see no business. Then maybe they will. It’s not your responsibility to put your own life and your families lives at risk in hopes that things will get better. They won’t! I live in Colorado, our state isn’t perfect but for fuck sakes we’re trying to make life better. I used to complain about all the out of state people moving here, but I realized the majority are political refugees fleeing areas in their own fucking country. We’d love to have you because we want to lead by example. Colorado used to be known as the “Hate State” and now is one of the most liberal and free states.

      • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Technically speaking you kind of do? The way the States have structured things your individual states have the same binding ability full on countries do… “Land of the Free” sounds kind of insane when you exist outside of that and see instead two countries at constant war with each other fighting over whose rules are the most binding over each of it’s citizens particularly… You can even be extradited back to a former state you lived in! That isn’t how it works for damn near every other democracy. That isn’t freedom that’s just color coded chains.

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would agree if I believed those places were actually capable of change. I do believe some red states are looking for the change. (North Carolina, Georgia, Montana are some examples.) I have family and friends in the south and the majority of people in those areas are amazing and don’t care about all these culture wars. But those in those areas that do are willing to do violence to achieve their goals. If you are a target of those that want to do harm, I can not in good conscience advice anything other than leaving. Currently women and LGBTQ+ individuals literally are in physical and mental danger. Those areas will kill them before giving up any more power. Flee if you can, and literally fight if you can’t. I guess that’s my main point. We’ve given those areas more than 200 years to get their shit together and have nothing to show for it.

        • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then the change has to come from outside. Just hoping they will change on their own is lazy and defeatist. Come help us fight.

          • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not defeatist it’s not letting your abuser have control over you especially when your life or the lives of your loved ones are in immediate Danger. I want to say find a politician that is using political violence against you and use actual violence, but you don’t have to when their somewhere willing to protect and give you freedom just 10 hours away. You can create change by simply walking away as well. Not everyone needs to be a martyr, not everyone can wait years or even months for the change they need. You can impact federal laws by not giving them your body for census and taxes. Back during the Jim crow south, I can’t imagine telling someone that they should hope for change while one of their relatives hangs from a tree or tell a parent of a raped little girl that’s now pregnant they need to be the ones standing and fighting. Fighting looks different and I support those that choose to fight. But no one is the Arbiter of what that looks like.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Indiana went for Obama in 2012. Yes, it went for Trump the next two elections, but I’d say that shows there is room for hope in red states.

      • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Part of the problem is that you can have a state consisting of 300 neckbeards and it will still have Senators and a Representative in Congress, and thus voting power on legislation. I don’t blame people for fleeing, but staying and making states blue will have a bigger effect on change.

        • TheFogan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well it comes down to 2 problems though.

          First and most obvious hitting that critical mass… before you hit it, everything is hell, you are stuck with BS laws, and you can’t do anything about it. Your vote is worthless.

          In my town this november there was one ballot issue… in short, it was summarized as "put a million dollars towards schools, build a new school on an unused empty lot owned by the school system, build a new sports field for one of the schools). Digging deeper that would be paid for by a proporty tax that would cost… up to 100 a year for people making over 150k.

          So… the whole town was plastered in “vote no” signs, when I went to the polling place a guy outside asked me to “strongly consider voting no”. I was one of the 17% that voted yes.

          So that basically tells me… demographically we need an insane change for the politics of this area to be less stupid, and that’s before factoring in that not only does it involve a HUGE change to reach 51%… but realistically we need more like 65-70% to counteract the inevitable gerymandering that will happen if we ever get anywhere close. I will be staying here, and I’d be happy to encourage all my progressive friends to stay and/or move here. But when it comes down to it, I’d be shocked if there is a swing in the next 50 years, and I certainly wouldn’t encourage anyone in a group that is likely to be directly oppressed to move here.

          • Skeezix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            And what’s more, if you’re going to have kids it’s not fair to raise them in that environment; to draft them into a struggle as they mature; to bequeath upon them the battle that you likely wont live to see won.

            I noped myself right out of America to a proper socialised democracy and now i live the American dream rather than spend my life and my kids lives fighting for it.

        • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s the problem though. It leaves those less capable stuck with no hope of their situation ever improving. Conservatives can be outnumbered. The easy thing is not necessarily the right thing.

            • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              You know that we can’t remove them from the country, right? Your way of thinking is exactly why the damned conservatives are as strong as they are. Ultimately you are giving them their best chance at taking even more political power. You should be ashamed of yourself for leaving those weaker and less capable than yourself to just be consumed by dogs. You are a coward and no better than them. One day they will be coming for you. Just know that.

        • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I did that, I would be telling my sister “Sucks to be you. I got out.” She can’t leave because of a custody agreement. She and her children are stuck with these laws. If the number of people you are talking about leave, that will ensure things with never get better for my sister, nieces, and nephew, that the laws will get worse and worse and they will legally not be allowed to move. But according to you, I should just tell her “sucks, I got mine”.

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They always wanted death panels. Just death panels THEY control so libs get culled and conservatives are forced to breed regardless of ability to raise a child.

    • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only way they will “see the light” is if they look around their states and see no women; see no educated individuals; see no hard working youths; and see no business

      I mean, they won’t “see no women”, women are nearly as likely to support forced birth as men. They don’t really care about the rest of that. They’d be quite glad to not have any opposition anymore, and be able to keep all those juicy senate seats and electoral college votes. Since they already have created an extremist Supreme Court, this would guarantee they wouldn’t lose the ability to veto or filibuster any attempt to fix it, while said Court continues to impose their views on the rest of the country.

  • 4grams@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is absolutely monstrous that in the country where stories like this happen daily, that the politician who is most responsible for this situation is the likely next president. It makes me physically sick.

    • Efwis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not to mention the cold-hearted attacks on these mothers for trying to protect their own lives since they know they can’t enjoy having the pleasure of being a parent to these children.

      This country, especially the southern states, don’t care about anything but themselves and controlling others.

      I’m so glad the wife and I are actively trying to get out of Texas. It’s not a place I want to raise a family as there are no real family values offered here except hate and control.

    • MTLion3@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s even more bizarre when women vote for / agree with this shit. What woman actually wants to go through this or thinks it’s necessary?

      • pezhore@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Don’t you know? All those abortions you hear about are for evil hussies who can’t stop getting with men.

        But if I have complications, I get to still have a medical procedure to terminate my pregnancy, right?

        /s

        https://archive.is/eLE8g

        • MTLion3@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          Awww shit, you right. I forgot that women are all just cum sluts and men are perfect angels who do nothing wrong ever. Good wholesome folks will have access to abortions if they’re life threatening without issue, suuuuurely

            • MTLion3@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              … Except mine was also obviously sarcastic. Which you missed.

              • eric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No, I didn’t miss it at all, but your sarcasm was written in a way that seemed to imply you missed theirs (which is why it was so heavily downvoted). The person you replied to even edited their comment to add an /s tag because your reply made them think you missed it.

      • no banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s because those women can feel power over those other women who aren’t as good as they are.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just wait till you find out what the current president is doing.

      Oh wait that’s not to white women and babies so it doesn’t matter.

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the lefty women, this is awful. For the righty women: this is what you voted for, suck it up and carry that dead baby.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Come on, be better than them. No woman deserves to suffer through this even if they voted against their own best interests.

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s horrid, I know. To have a dead baby inside you and to suddenly find that anti-abortion lawmaker you so gleefully supported is preventing you from removing its lifeless body. Who could have known, right? Maybe if we pray?

        Maybe going through that will give them the missing empathy they needed to be a decent human being

          • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            38
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            At this point, in 2023, we are on the verge of an authoritarian takeover. We lost RvW, next is same sex marriage, then voting rights, and boom! Back to pre 1920. So forgive me if I’m not particularly sad when leopards devour someone’s face.

          • Bananigans@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re not describing empathy. It sounds like the person you’re responding to already knows how bad that outcome is which is why they’re against authoritarian law to begin with. You’re just more sympathetic towards people facing the consequences of their own decisions. Which is fine. But that crowd already used up all of mine over COVID. And climate change is just around the corner. Glad you still have some sympathy left to go around for leopard victims.

          • Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s not time to be empathetic, it’s time for you fucking Americans to get mad. To riot against your rights being stripped.

          • Crikeste@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Their entire platform is to lack empathy, and they voted for it.

            I’m not gonna pretend to care about them, simply because they couldn’t care about anyone else.

      • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing is, I don’t really care what people “deserve”, or what they “don’t deserve”. How should I know? I’ll be a dork and quote Tolkien: “Many that live deserve death. Some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them, Frodo? Do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment.”

        But I do care about who’s in the pact. We have an agreement, between us, we decent people. We watch out for each other. We protect each other. Or if we can’t, when something terrible is done to somebody, at the very least, we speak out, in protest, in sympathy, in sorrow. And the people covered by this pact, as far as I’m concerned, are the people who follow it - that’s it, the sole criteria for membership, about the lowest bar possible.

        I’m not going to force somebody to carry a dead fetus because they forced other people to do so, but when the cruel laws they always thought would only apply to other people suddenly apply to them, I don’t owe them my sympathy either. They aren’t in the pact.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Frank Wilhoit: “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition… There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

          Which is why you and others here are disturbing me quite a bit right now.

          • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hmm, a quote I quite like myself. Let’s see. I have defined two groups. I have not suggested that either group should not be bound by the law, nor that either group should by better protected by the law than the other. In fact, this entire part of the discussion is predicated on the law, which one group has imposed on the other, applying equally.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then shouldn’t the call be “let’s change the law so none of these women suffer” rather than “it’s good if the women who voted for the people who changed the law suffer for it?”

      • rosymind@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m with you on this. I worry that too mamy people cheer on the pain of the “other” without realizing that in doing so they become the worst of what they hate

        People make bad decisions, but then some of them grow. To tell them that they deserve their pain, just because they didn’t understand what it was they were doing, is pretty fucked up

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh. If they genuinely have a change of heart and are horrified at their previous self, we can afford to show grace. If they go right back to supporting Republicans, fuck them.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        They have a change of heart but years later after they are past the age to have kids they go right back. The number of older women trying to take away the rights they enjoyed is disgusting.

        • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I appreciate the intent of your correction. For most abortions, yes, blastocyst. I’m not an expert, but I think that the body will usually safely flush out a failed blastocyst, and as the article said, many of these absolute nightmare scenarios cannot be diagnosed until well past that stage, so in this context, I think fetus is correct.

  • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every pregnancy is so taxing on the body, and can have a huge impact on a woman’s future health. To make women go through it against their will, or for a child that won’t live/have any quality of life is evil and vile. Sometimes, I wish their God were real, just so these fuckers can get to the pearly gates and get booted straight down to hell for all eternity.

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Might as well implement Sharia law in some US states. You’re not far behind the Taliban.