Maybe as a woman she shouldn’t get a say in how manly men are. Neither do I. And frankly I think every man should get to decide for himself.
If a man wants to be feminine fuckin let him. If he wants to be masculine fuckin let him. So long as he isn’t being a dick about it it’s none of anyone else’s business
But the right has no policy to run on so it needs something to drum up fear about. Insecure men eat up the alpha male, testosterone, feminine man bullshit.
Yeah, and so I’m going to say very loudly as a woman, I’m friends with feminine guys, masculine guys, guys who are neither, and guys who are both. But what I’m not friends with is guys who can’t just fucking be themselves. We aren’t trying to feminize you unless you want help being more feminine, in which case yeah I’ll gladly give some eyeliner tips.
Masculine men with confidence and self esteem don’t need other men to be masculine for them. Ok some do, but that’s because that’s their type.
And if you’re still struggling with accepting how other men are, try therapy. It may help with whatever is causing you to push your expectations on strangers
I completely agree and am glad others have such an open mind.
That’s asking a lot from a group of people seething over the idea that somewhere out there is a person they’ll never meet with an opinion about their own genitals that isn’t far-right approved.
Yup, as long as it’s not hurting someone else, why give a shit?
Gay sex is literally twice as manly as straight sex, at a minimum. Just saying.
Sometimes it’s 10x or 20x as gay
Assuming that anyone identified as a man can never have less than 1.0 manliness (100% normalized between 0 and 1) by definition, and further, that a man topping another man is producing manliness in excess of 1.0, while a man bottoming will never drop below 1.0, we can conclude that a gay orgy will have more total manliness on average, than the same number of men individually.
N = number of men.
M = average manliness of individuals
L = additional manliness caused by topping.(N * M) + L >= N * M
Guys, we could do a paper. Let’s do a paper.
Manly men with lungs and ego so delicate that a wearing a mask would literally kill them.
Candace calling the GOP pussies is a bold move for her audience.
Candace Owens telling on every dude she’s ever dated crying after sex. It’s not them, Candace, it’s you.
Wait, so gender is a social construct, not biological now?
Shrodiger’s penis.
“Hey babe, the name’s Schrodinger. You may have heard of me. My penis is in a quantum state of both hard and soft until it’s observed. I bet I can guess which one it’ll be when you look.”
Her fashion choice here expresses some straight jacket vibes.
I thought she looked like Leia
Right? It looks like a bedsheet, but with arm tubes. Almost as ridiculous and stupid as her shameless words.
A straight jacket on her would be an improvement.
This meme is an example of how the superstructure maintains the base.
It’s ideology misdirecting attention away from class conscientiousness. If we’re angry about a perceived cultural wrong, we’re not paying attention to how wages have stagnated while productivity has soared.
Maybe Marxism, at least as a diagnostic tool, isn’t such a bad thing after all.
I have not at all noticed any shortage of generic dudebros.
(satire) Those are some big words from the little lady. Don’t worry your pretty little head, Candace, just go back in the kitchen and look after the kids, like a feminine woman. Let the manly men deal with this issue. You shouldn’t stress your delicate constitution getting involved in politics. (/satire)
Fake people engineered by groups to make you fight other people you have no real beef with so that they can keep doing illegal shit that steals from you and your family.
You want me to stop being a femboy? Why don’t you make me 😏
Obligatory Brooks: https://youtu.be/G59JnM4JKNQ?si=ZuvbDqYBUrLnTxuj
Nice free association there but wrong. I am sure it’s a hit on the JRE.
Candice Owens: “Correlation = Causation. I haz a beg Brian u lesen tu me nao. Markism baaaad, vote dictator Trump!”
