Sales targets meant to ensure automakers ramp up EV production to keep up with demand, says source

  • xmunk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    We’ve still got to contend with the horrible environmental effects of tire dust - EV or ICE.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      And the urban sprawl from car dependancy, the salting of the roads, stormwater run off from roads, the wasted urban space that is massive surface parking lots, and noise pollution from the tires. EVs solve very few problems related to cars.

      • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s really the biggest issue that’s unfortunately not at the forefront. Sure, EVs are much more energy efficient and therefore less polluting in the form of fossil fuel burn, but the way we travel is incredibly inefficient given the available technologies. Our country was literally built on the railroad, yet there is very little reasonable passenger rail alternatives in much of the country.

        • sbv
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          EVs are much more energy efficient

          Isn’t the lifetime difference something like 30% better than ICE? It’s definitely better, but it isn’t significantly better.

          • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Turns out bringing 3000+ pounds of steel with you everywhere you go is ineffecient regardless how it is powered.

            • sbv
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’ve heard cars described as metal overcoats. People slap them on for the slightest reason.

          • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I’ll use my two, similar sized cars as an example (Subaru Outback and Hyundai Ioniq 5). Typical driving gets me around 8 L/100km in the Outback and 20 kWh/100km in the Ioniq. This NRCan site gives a conversion factor of 8.9 kWh/L of gasoline.

            So, the Ioniq, at 20 kWh/100km is then about 72% more efficient than the Subaru at its equivalent 71.2 kWh/100km.

            Even when considering lifetime emissions, EVs still have roughly 50% less emissions than ICE vehicles.

            However, going back to my original point, person vehicles are still incredibly inefficient overall, given the potential alternatives.

      • xmunk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Trains? Trains are great - and buses produce a lot less tire dust per passenger.

      • psvrh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Building communities that are walkable? I mean, we could try that, but it wouldn’t make rich people richer.

      • xmunk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Trains. Trains are the solution.

        The answer has been right in front of us the entire time!