• Socsa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    12 is arguably a better arithmetic base than 10 since it divides nicely by 2, 3, 4 and 6 instead of just 2 and 5.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I wish some countries would go this way and use 12-based as a default, while others would use 8-based because it’s closer to computers, and others will continue using 10-based.

      And then no-one will denote the system used because it’s the default, how’s that you don’t understand. Oh what a beautiful world we’d be living in 🥰

      • Socsa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The point is that there are benefits to several different arithmetic bases for different purposes and forming some kind of dogma around any of them is weird.

        • 0x4E4F
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well, there isn’t a perfect one… better just agree on using one, whichever that might be.

          • Socsa
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Agree, so we will all just use hexadecimal since it is a convenient way to represent both fixed point and floating point arithmetic.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          There is no dogma, when doing maths you’re free to use anything even as esoteric as Fibonacci base. The problem is when this becomes widespread but not everywhere.

          If you’re for using it “for different purposes” I can’t even understand the point of your original comment, why preach?

          • Socsa
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I am definitely not the one being preachy about a particular base. I am the one advocating flexibility over dogma.

            All I did was point out that 12 is easier to divide cleanly than ten, and this very simple fact has pissed many people off for some reason.

    • 0x4E4F
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes, I do agree with that. It just takes time getting used to it.

    • MrNobody
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If only we had a way to have numbers smaller than 1.

      • Socsa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Right, having more whole, proper fractions to work with can also be simpler (and more precise) than truncating decimals and dealing with the implications of significant figures. I just don’t understand why people are so hostile to this as a basic idea. Base 12 has benefits, just like base ten does.