A research institute of the Bank of Korea (BOK) said Sunday that Korea may be forced to record negative economic growth in the 2040s unless the nation improves its productivity, as its working-age population is rapidly shrinking.

In a report, the BOK’s Economic Research Institute expected Korea’s economy to grow some 2.1 percent in the 2020s and some 0.6 percent in the 2030s but to shrink some 0.1 percent in the 2040s.

The assessment by Cho Tae-hyung, vice head of the institute, was based on an assumption that Korea may fail to improve its productivity to make up for a decline in the working-age population.

If Korea improves its productivity to cope with a demographic change, the report predicted that the nation’s economy would grow some 2.4 percent in the 2020s, some 0.9 percent in the 2030s and some 0.2 percent in the 2040s.

“It is most important to keep productivity growth to mitigate future slowdowns in economic growth,” Cho said in the report.

The BOK has recently projected Korea’s economy to grow 1.4 percent for all of 2023, down from a 2.6 percent expansion in 2022. (Yonhap)

  • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wouldn’t constant positive evonomic growth be unsustainable unless you have constant population growth?

    • ripcord@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep.

      So far everyone has just expected that to be someone else’s problem in the future and had zero interest in planning for it.

      • Goku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah the “free market” will work itself out /s

        USA is facing a similar problem with boomers retiring.

    • Webster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Constant productivity growth could allow it without constant population growth, as long as products growth exceeds impacts from population decline. This report is basically saying they don’t see that happening.

      • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m no economist but doesn’t productivity have a maximum? On top of that wouldn’t demand also have a maximum for a given population? At some point it’d hit steady state.

        • Webster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It depends on what you feel about the future of technology. Most productivity growth comes from advances in technology. We haven’t hit a maximum yet, so it’s a question of if you think technology will or won’t enable us to do more in the same amount of time for the indefinite future.