• watson387@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Me either, but it’s actually meant to be offensive whereas Caucasians is just a classification.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        You would be if they had stolen your home and pranced around in a caricature costume of you through the stadium they built after bulldozing your land

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, but that’s the point. They didn’t do that to white people, so white people are in no position to be offended. Including me. Which is why I’m not only not offended, but find that highly appropriate.

          • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            What is happening when white people are like “I’m not offended by this” is to minimize the offense that native Americans feel about the same thing.

            As if to say “I’m not offended, why are they?”

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cracker isn’t an epithet that native Americans have ever used though.

      Paleface would be the matching slur to redskin.