• kase@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      create a division that’s biological females only.

      As a trans man, I see this as an absolute win. /s

      I’m just making a pedantic joke btw. I’m assuming you’re talking about cis women.

      • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s clear that Joe is just a transphobe hiding behind “Oooo technically important oooo” ignoring the fact that the fascists want to check children’s genitals not for any of those “important” reasons

          • Nikki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            wanting to probe my genitals while not being my doctor is transphobic, that is the only person who would EVER have to see my genitals. anything more is a sign of a serious issue, words cannot describe the discomfort that would cause me, and im a grown adult.

      • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        If they were talking about that set it would be useful to specify that set. But of course that would mean using icky terms like “cis” instead of denying the humanity and even biological existence of trans people. Can’t be having that, now.

      • violetraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        The women’s sports that they care so highly about at this time for some reason. Next they’ll probably talk about some hypothetical niece that plays sports and “whatever will she do” in sports with the trans

        • Perfide@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          11 months ago

          If there’s no genetic advantage for men, why did Chess have separate divisions?

          The ACTUAL answer is misogyny. Chess was(and still is tbh) a very misogynistic “sport” back in the day, and many male professional chess players refused to play against women, and the ones that did play against them were often crude. To try and get more women interested in chess, women only divisions were created. It has literally nothing to do with genetic advantages.

        • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          You must be a troll account because a human capable of literacy asking that question honestly is beyond comprehension.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          I can’t speak for chess, but in gaming where there’s similarly no sex advantage, female gamers are rarely seen at the higher levels because the environment is very hostile towards them. Creating a separate women’s league would alleviate this to some degree and encourage more women to actually try to reach for the top.

                • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  That our society didn’t even let women take part in marathons at one point and the first time someone did that was by just taking part without making clear that they’re a woman and they’ll be themselves taking part in it. You can draw your conclusion from that

                • kase@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  If there’s no difference in sports or shit with men and women, shouldn’t we just have one division?

                  I would think so, yes. I’m no expert on either lol.

                  If a sport that doesn’t depend on physicality still has separate divisions ( literally chess) what does that mean to you?

                  What is it supposed to mean? I have no idea why it’s like that. Here’s a relevant wikipedia article. I don’t know why you’re asking me this lmao, but I didn’t come here for an argument. I made a joke. Peace out ✌️

            • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Why would a sport which removed all physicality, still have separate divisions?

              Shithead bigots such as yourself, one would imagine.

              You’re using the existence of an oppression to justify the further propagation of that very oppression, and begging the question further.

    • Rambomst@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You are missing the fact that this issue is so unimportant and that even talking about it when everything else is on fire is… well… kind of moronic tbh.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          There may be environmental issues which are dependent on your gender at birth.

          Can you elaborate on what you mean by this and why it’s important? I don’t understand how your gender at birth affects the environment in any way that matters.

        • SomeSphinx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          “means more” isn’t a factual statement, it’s a value judgement and some people value being the best version of themselves more than they value leading a miserable existence because of their genetics. Environmental issues are also just that: results of the environment rather than innate expression of X or Y chromosomes. The point the OP post is making is that instead of focusing on economic policies, global warming, and wars, politicians are more focused on who decides they’d be happier as a man/woman/non binary person. It’s a complete waste of time for everyone BUT doctors and researchers since we shouldn’t be judging or limiting what people can do based on what genitals they were born with, and instead be focusing on how to fix massive, glaring, and disastrous issues such as the ones described in the post.

    • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      whatever genitals you’re born with at birth is actually an important fact.

      You sure seem intensely interested in baby genitals.

      Should …should we call somebody? 🤨