Former Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) bashed former President Trump online and said Christians who support him “don’t understand” their religion.

“I’m going to go out on a NOT limb here: this man is not a Christian,” Kinzinger said on X, formerly known as Twitter, responding to Trump’s Christmas post. “If you are a Christian who supports him you don’t understand your own religion.”

Kinzinger, one of Trump’s fiercest critics in the GOP, said in his post that “Trump is weak, meager, smelly, victim-ey, belly-achey, but he ain’t a Christian and he’s not ‘God’s man.’”

  • btaf45@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    No, he used the word difficult.

    Initially. Then he realized he needed to be more blunt. So he gave a metaphor making it clear it was almost impossible, and even bluntly said “with man this is impossible”. The reaction of the disciples also prove it had nothing at all to do with any “gate”.

    23Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven.

    24Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”

    25When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and asked, “Who then can be saved?”

    26Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”

    • sugar_in_your_tea
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Who then can be saved?

      They were astonished because, at the time, wealth was considered to be a sign of favor from God. Jesus’ statements at the time went directly against that, and that’s what surprised them. There was similar surprise at his statements that the meek and humble would inherit the earth and go to heaven.

      The scandal wasn’t that rich people in general probably wouldn’t go to heaven, but that seemingly righteous people wouldn’t go to heaven.

      Who then can be saved?

      With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.

      I think he’s referring to salvation generally here. Man cannot save himself, so no amount of wealth will be helpful. God can save man, and he is the one that makes it possible.

      So whether it’s a gate or a literal needle isn’t really relevant, God controls who gets to heaven, and God’s expectations are at odds with people who love money. The message here is that wealth doesn’t indicate favor with God and it cannot save you, so you should focus on what can save you. You can have wealth and those attributes, but wealth attracts selfish people, and those selfish attributes will prevent you from entering heaven.