• mindbleach
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    One of these lines adds context and the other does not.

    It is that simple.

    • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They both add context when put together. The meme would be different without either line. If we take away the first line, your Uncle is alone, talking to himself.

      Both of these lines are superfluous. The meme’s format is to move from a generic statement to a specific one. How each line builds the scene is different, but they are both building the same scene.

      The more important question is what does all of this context get us? As we both seem to agree, not a lot.

      • mindbleach
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It would be markedly different without one line. It would be negligibly different without the other.

        • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The difference is notable removing either line. But removing them all is just as negligible as removing one in terms of impact to the delivery of the meme.

            • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              No on both counts.

              This is a weird thing to be in denial about.

              It’s a different meme if either line is removed. This is self evident by covering either line on the screen by hand. The parts of the meme each have meaning, but that meaning isn’t consequential to the delivery of the content. It’s all fluff that can be removed.

              What do we lose by removing the line about your Uncle that helps with the delivery of the content?

              Neither of these three options improve on the existing content:

              Nobody: Your Uncle: content

              Nobody: content

              Your Uncle: content

              They all functionally work and could act as mechanisms for delivering content. Your Uncle is certainly the more specific out of the two lines. But it doesn’t do anything better than this option:

              content

              If something is fun, by all means leave it in. I’m sure that’s what people would say ‘nobody:’ does for them. But it’s not for a lack of meaning that the statement is superfluous. It’s the lack of effectiveness in assisting the delivery of content that all of these lines share. Pick and choose which ones are fun if that matters, but if we only care about utility then removing all forms of fluff should be the goal.

              • mindbleach
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                My guy, ‘the generic line adds much less than the specific one’ is not some kind of contradiction.

                And that generic line gets slapped on anything, as if it’s just… how images do. It’s objectionable specifically because it’s essentially useless.Unlike the other line, which would simply not make sense in most other contexts.

                This is not worth the wall of text. It’s really not complicated.

                • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  My guy, ‘the generic line adds much less than the specific one’ is not some kind of contradiction.

                  How much it’s adding is really a subjective judgment and not relevant to the discussion. The fact is both lines add something in terms of context. However this context has no value for the purpose of delivering content.

                  Unlike the other line, which would simply not make sense in most other contexts.

                  Right, the line is more specific. Why is it worth appending a specific line of text before content? Isn’t that also just a case of ‘how images do’?

                  This is not worth the wall of text. It’s really not complicated.

                  Right so let’s remove all of the text before the content. I’m glad we agree. This is not some gacha argument. I am legitimately saying we do not need this meme as a delivery mechanism for content. Just the image on its own is sufficient. edit: typo

                  • mindbleach
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    ‘No no no and here’s why.’

                    ‘I’m glad we agree.’

                    Fuck off already.