• friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The thing is, driving a flying car isn’t going to be like driving a ground car. It’ll be like flying an autonomous drone, like a DJI drone, which is easy and has lots of safety features. You tell it to take off, and it takes off and hovers. You tell it to go up, and it goes up, and then stays at the height it stopped at. You try to go somewhere you’re not allowed, like another “lane”, and it will be like hitting an invisible pillow. (This happens with DJI drones at restricted airspace boundaries.) There is an auto-land feature, and an auto “Return To Home” feature. The driver (pilot) doesn’t have to balance the vehicle, or deal with complex controls, or compensate for wind, because those are all handled by software that interfaces with the flight controller, GPS, and other hardware. It’s similar to using an Xbox controller, and it’s way, way easier than autonomous ground cars.

    I’m not saying there aren’t significant risks, but piloting the vehicle is probably one of the least concerning problems.

    I worked at a self driving car startup for three years and we all thought flying cars would be easier.

    • Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Imagine having to work out self driving in 3D traffic though. I guess at least you won’t have pedestrians, mostly.

      • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Obstacle identification and avoidance, and route planning in a dynamic environment are some of the biggest challenges with autonomous ground cars. In the sky, you don’t have bicyclists and delivery truck drivers stopped in the lane, and stuff like that. Even DJI drones can fly around trees and buildings. Again though, it’s not that there’s no risk, but the problems aren’t nearly as difficult to solve.

        In cars, you perform SLAM, simultaneous localization and mapping. In the sky, SLAM is way easier.

        • Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Aren’t other flying cars going to be the dynamic part of the environment? Is what I’m asking

          • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Sure, but we can expect that they will be communicating with each other in a RemoteID kind of way, but with additional information like up to date location and intended motion vector. Also, air traffic is already divided up into different heights for different directions.

    • Nommer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There is absolutely no way we’re anywhere close to fully autonomous self flying cars. So far there hasn’t been a real successful self driving car either, just buggy demos that corporations claimed worked. Flying cars would have to have special training and much much much much much (x20 more) regulation. I don’t trust over half the dumb shits in a 4 wheeled car. And my job requires me to drive all over the state. I have to avoid dying in a wreck at least 2-3 times a week from cars, trucks, SUVs, and semis. I DO NOT want those idiots flying anywhere near me or around me because they will cause deaths due to their indifference. I can’t just slam on the brakes and stop due to an impatient retard in the air. I don’t want 20 year old zoomers looking at tiktok while sharing airspace with me. Flying cars are a pipe dream and it’s mostly because people are stupid and can’t control themselves and believe they’ll die if they don’t beat that car by 0.002 seconds.