• thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wonder if this is factory flubs during assembly or a side effect of expansion and contraction via environment elements and pressurization? Maybe something new with a different style of carbon fiber monocoque?

    • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shouldn’t the testing identify that and the proper torque be identified?

      Or did they skip that part for the “no door here” component and figure it wouldn’t be an issue?

      • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not enough information to identify if it’s a torque issue or not. And yes, I would expect that chassis testing would have included that, but Boeing has had a bad track record, recently, around POC / implementation testing. Cutting corners to eek out them quarterly dividends and look good to investors by keeping on an arbitrarily chosen schedule.