• thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 年前

    Wonder if this is factory flubs during assembly or a side effect of expansion and contraction via environment elements and pressurization? Maybe something new with a different style of carbon fiber monocoque?

    • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 年前

      Shouldn’t the testing identify that and the proper torque be identified?

      Or did they skip that part for the “no door here” component and figure it wouldn’t be an issue?

      • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 年前

        Not enough information to identify if it’s a torque issue or not. And yes, I would expect that chassis testing would have included that, but Boeing has had a bad track record, recently, around POC / implementation testing. Cutting corners to eek out them quarterly dividends and look good to investors by keeping on an arbitrarily chosen schedule.