• starman2112
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      But… She had money! What, do you expect her not to try to make her gold breed? People with money should get more money! It’s only fair!

      /s

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        She had a few hundred K, she needs to make that divorce settlement last until she retires. Social Security is absolutely nothing

        • starman2112
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          a few hundred k

          That doesn’t really make me feel sorry for my comment. I make do with <25k a year. A few hundred k would last me over a decade.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            She spends the same amount of money as you do, she just doesn’t plan on dying in a decade.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      My mom is the landlord and remodeling houses IS her work. She was a stay at home mom until I grew up, that’s what she does for a living after she divorced my dad. She lives on the rent of her properties while she does each project

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        She lives on the rent of her properties

        This is exactly the thing people have issues with. The whole “I am the breadwinner of my landlord’s household.”

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s why I thought she should just buy stocks and live off dividends instead. I mean, any investment has a rate of return or people would not buy it

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yup, and housing shouldn’t be an investment. It can be affordable, or an investment, not both.

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Then you should support less zoning restrictions and lower development fees to increase the availability of housing.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                I do? But I also support laws that heavily tax owning secondary properties. Building more houses is not helpful if they just get purchased by landlords.

                • iopq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Landlords follow market pricing, so if there’s enough housing the prices go down. Landlords are not the reason rent is high

                  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Landlords are not the reason rent is high

                    If being a landlord is profitable where do you think that profit comes from? Logically landlord’s need to be making housing more expensive so they can get their cut.