Critics condemn ‘cruelty’ of state opting out of federal problem to feed children from low-income families during summer break

Mississippi is withdrawing from a federal program to feed children during their summer break from school, the governor there announced, characterizing the decision as a way to reject “attempts to expand the welfare state”.

Governor Tate Reeves, a Republican, declined to participate in the federal program that would give electronic benefit transfer (EBT) cards to low-income families to supplement food costs when academic classes are out of session, Mississippi Today reported.

“The cruelty of being the poorest state in America and choosing – choosing – to turn down federal aid for poor children to eat,” Hannah-Jones said in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter.

“Mississippi gave millions of dollars of welfare funds to former NFL quarterback Brett Favre to build a volleyball facility for his daughter’s school, but they won’t take federal funds to feed hungry children. Because helping poor kids is the kind of welfare that Republicans hate,” Boykin said on X.

      • Ashyr
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        They’re not even pro-birth. Abortions are an important aspect of maternal care. They’re anti-women and that’s literally all there is to it. Misogyny is all there is to it.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          That and they want more poor babies being born to feed the system and maintain the class gap

        • forrgott@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh for sure. I figure it’s an immature way to take our their anger at anybody, anywhere, who dares oppose an “abstinence only” approach to sex ed, as well as a way to openly threaten the safety of women in general, of course. Pair this with their disgusting views on things like consent and no fault divorce and the pattern is kinda blatantly obvious.

        • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Also, how do they know Jaye-sus won’t wave a magic finger and move the ectopic pregnancy / correct the genetic defect that guarantees (+/-) a stillbirth / etc. just in time to save the day? Supporting healthcare that includes access to abortions would be too close to admitting that miracles don’t happen and that’s bad for the brand.

  • Bone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Meanwhile Brett Favre gets to steal from poor people. What a stand up sit down piece of shit. Favre’s daughter, the welfarest queen of them all!

      • EndOfLine@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        To be fair, both of his daughters are adults, and more than capable of speaking out against their father’s abhorrent behavior. Additionally, they stand to benefit, directly or indirectly from their father’s actions. They are also likely to be among the very small group of people that Brett Farve would listen to and could be shamed by. I would not consider them innocent bystandards.

        • vortic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          11 months ago

          Bystanders?

          How well formed were your morals when you were college aged? How much of your morals were formed by your parents? It seems like it could be difficult for some kids to call their parents out on their bullshit at that age. That might be especially true for the daughter of someone who is put up on a pedistal like Farve.

          I agree that it’s a shame if Farve’s daughter didn’t call him out for what he was doing but I think it probably reflects more in Farve than on his daughter. When I was 18 I wouldn’t have questioned my parents on something like this. I would have assumed they were doing their best for me and being moral people while doing it. I didn’t develop my own ability to assess my parents actions, beyond how they impacted me directly, until I was out of the house for a few years.

          • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            …you are saying college kids are incapable of recognizing and understanding crime. You do get that right?

          • SeaJ@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m pretty sure most 18 year olds are moral enough to know that stealing a couple million dollars from poor people is fucking wrong. Good god.

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 months ago

    The irony of not accepting children’s food money, but taking oil, farm, and tax break money, funded by Blue counties and states, and saying “we aren’t welfare queens” sure, you’re still on welfare but now your kids are going hungry. Good job American South.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 months ago

    These ghouls hate children. They have rolled back most of the child labor laws and refuse to feed them. Politicians doing these type of actions should not be allowed to feel safe or comfortable in public.

  • atomicorange@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you give kids free lunches, they will have no incentive to get jobs cleaning slaughterhouses! Without this opressive welfare program, the kids will be free to choose whether to continue on to middle school or leave their studies behind for a lucrative career in an abattoir.

  • shastaxc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 months ago

    They’ve got the wrong idea. Mississippi is picked on for being a poor state which is a shitty place to live. Calling it a “welfare state” is just a short and convenient descriptor. Taking less federal funding will not change anyone’s opinion of Mississippi.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Know what could change people’s opinion about Mississippi? Maybe a generation of better nutrition and education.

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I don’t understand why these federal programs are optional for states. Doesn’t make sense why you wouldn’t want free money for your state.

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Scoring political points is more important than feeding children is why.

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hey red states, you’ve got options. I mean, y’all have all the guns to protect yourself against the government. Pony up.