• prole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure I understand. Do you mind explaining your position?

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m guessing they mean the DEA shouldn’t both decide drug classification and enforce those same classifications.

      That can be fixed by other means, though, such as by giving the FDA classification rights that the DEA then enforces. Killing Chevron deference would only make things worse; the court now gets to decide and enforce.

      The flip side is that more progressive judges can also second guess decisions. EPA says that PFAS is fine and we’re not going to regulate it? The court could step in on that. FCC says net neutrality doesn’t need to exist? The court could step in on that.

      Killing Chevron only makes sense for conservatives if they think they will own the courts indefinitely. They probably thought they would during the Trump Administration, but he lost the last election, and the Supreme Court massively overstepped with abortion rights and caused their side a whole bunch of new problems. They may not be so sure of their ability to capture the judicial system as they were a few years back. A lot depends on how the next election pans out.